Overview of March 1 House Pensions Committee Meeting

House Committee on Pensions, Investment, and Financial Services members met on March 1 to discuss the Employee Retirement System and the Teacher Retirement System, among other topics.

The full agenda is available here. For a video archive of the hearing, visit here.

The following is intended to provide an overview of the discussion and is not a verbatim transcript. This report only focuses on the Employee Retirement and Teacher Retirement systems.

Opening Comments

  • Committee Chair, Rep. Giovanni Capriglione, and Vice Chair, Rep. Stan Lambert – Thank the House Speaker for their appointments.

Employees Retirement System

Porter Wilson, Executive Director of ERS

  • Presented an overview of the agency
  • The agency manages four pension plans with ERS; three are prefunded
  • State employees contribute 9.5% of their salary to the plan; new employees contribute 6%
  • The state contributes 9.5%, agencies contribute .5%
  • There are about 130,000 state employees that contribute to the pension plan
  • The number of people that are not contributing to the plan has grown over the last five years
  • 70% of the state's workforce comes from five state agencies
  • Last session, all three pre-funded pension funds were set to run out of money
  • Coming out of the last session, SB 321 helped ERS fund and is now in good shape
  • The two other funds were not addressed and are not where they need to be
  • Starting last September, the state created a cash balance plan
  • With the introduced version of the GR Bill, the combined projected savings are $7B
  • All higher education agencies have access to health benefits except for the UT and A&M systems
  • Have not had to ask for an increase to health benefits since 2017

Teacher Retirement System

Brian Guthrie, Executive Director of TRS

  • Gave an overview of the TRS
  • Agency manages three separate trust funds
  • The biggest is the teacher retirement trust fund, which has 1.5M retirees
  • Provide two healthcare programs, one for retirees, and one for active members
  • The fund serves 675,000 members, and it is not co-mingled
  • The board decides everything that goes into the pension fund; it has nine trustees
  • Five must-have investment experience; three are direct appointments by the board; two are from SBOE
  • The remaining four are active members of the system
  • The legislature is responsible for designing a plan for the fund
  • Half of the plan's assets are global equities, and it's the 5th largest plan in the nation
  • The agency uses a long-term return assumption of 7%
  • The fund pays about $13B in benefits a year; October was the first time paying $1B in a month
  • There is no COLA associated with the funds
  • The legislature addressed the COLA some last session with supplemental payments
  • There is a new contingency rider introduced in the GR bill that addresses COLA for retirees
  • TRS had a negative return of 6%; the prior year, it had an increase of 24%
  • If the legislature has a plan structure in mind to address benefit enhancement, TRS can model it
  • Given the size of the plan, a 1% increase would cost $1.1B to finance; the number is scalable
  • The last COLA provided was in 2013; it was not prefinanced and was done through the fund; the state is still paying for the benefit enhancements and will be for the next 10 years
  • Recommend upfront payments since they are prefinanced and do not have a large effect on the fund
  • Explained the function of the Employment After Retirement program (EAR)
  • Last session, there was legislation passed that created a 3-strike system for EAR; since then, no one has gotten three strikes
  • The agency is aware of the issues with the program; e.g., surcharge it's a new charge for districts
  • There are two health care funds; the first is active care, second is TRS care
  • State only has half of the healthcare membership in active care
  • Districts can elect to have their own, e.g., Austin, San Antonio, and Houston provide their own plans
  • During the last session, the federal covid relief package provided $250 million, and the Gov. provided $350 million; the money was used to offset premium increases in active care
  • This one-time funding caused premiums to be artificially depressed
  • The state is now in the position to have to increase premiums by 20-30% to finance the program
  • TRS has a plan that would increase premiums annually by 7-9% over six years; this would put premiums back where they need to be
  • SB 1444 last session allowed districts to have the option to opt out of the program
  • No longer have one statewide premium; it's now regionally based (regional ratings)
  • Changes in 2017 made by the legislature made it so supplemental funding for TRS is not needed
  • It could be three more sessions before TRS care needs more funding
  • Leo Wilson - I left TRS care and am now in ERS. Do I have a year to opt-in?
    • Yes, there is a window for people that opted out because of the changes made
  • Leo Wilson- If you didn't leave for that reason, would I be able to opt back in?
    • Yes
Note: TEXPERS, along with the Association's Legislative Committee and government affairs consultant, is monitoring the session, especially for any actions regarding public employee pensions. Check back for regular updates.
 

FOLLOW TEXPERS ON FACEBOOKTWITTER, AND LINKEDIN FOR THE LATEST NEWS ABOUT TEXAS' PUBLIC PENSION INDUSTRY.

 
Share this post:

Comments on "Overview of March 1 House Pensions Committee Meeting"

Comments 0-2 of 0

Please login to comment