Donald Trump's re-election to the U.S. presidency and the Republican Congressional wins have introduced a wave of uncertainty and opportunity for leaders of public employee pension systems. With significant changes likely on the horizon for tax policies, trade tariffs, retirement benefits, and investment regulations, it's crucial for those managing the funds of active and retired annuitants to stay informed. This article unpacks how these potential policy shifts could impact public pensions and the broader retirement landscape, providing valuable insights for stakeholders navigating this evolving environment.

Potential Tax Changes

One of the most immediate areas to watch is taxation. President-elect Trump and a potentially Republican-led Congress have signaled interest in further tax cuts, likely aimed at boosting economic activity. This could involve reducing capital gains taxes, which might benefit pension portfolios in terms of net returns on investments. However, tax cuts could also lead to reduced federal revenue, possibly affecting state funding and creating pressure on local governments—a situation public pension systems must monitor closely.

Furthermore, proposals to extend individual tax cuts passed in 2017 might be on the horizon, alongside discussions about estate tax modifications. Such changes could impact the retirement planning landscape and the broader economic stability that pensions rely upon.

Trade and Tariffs: The Economic Ripple Effect

Another key area is tariffs. During Trump's first term, the U.S. saw significant trade policy shifts, emphasizing protecting domestic industries through tariffs on goods from China, Europe, and elsewhere. There's speculation that Trump's return to the White House could mean a resumption or even escalation of tariffs, particularly with China.

In his recent statements, Trump has proposed implementing a blanket tariff ranging from 10% to 20% on all imports, with an additional 60% to 100% tariffstargeting goods from China. The primary objectives of these tariffs are to generate revenue for the U.S. government and to encourage domestic production by making imported goods more expensive, thereby incentivizing companies to manufacture products within the United States. 

This matters for pension funds because tariffs are taxes on imports that make foreign goods more expensive, encouraging domestic purchases. They can impact the global supply chain, increasing business costs and potential market volatility. Investment portfolios heavily reliant on global equities or companies with exposure to trade might face increased risks. On the other hand, some domestic sectors could benefit from protectionist measures, potentially presenting opportunities for targeted investments.

ESG Policy: A Shift Away from Emphasis?

Perhaps one of the most contentious changes involves environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, investment policy. During the previous Trump administration, there was a marked effort to roll back ESG-focused regulations, notably in areas that required fiduciaries to consider climate change risks or social governance issues in their investment decisions. The current administration could renew efforts to reduce the regulatory emphasis on ESG investing.

For public employee retirement systems that have already integrated ESG factors into their investment frameworks, this may mean facing a shifting regulatory landscape with fewer federal mandates supporting such considerations. Pension boards might want to decide whether to stay the course or adjust their strategies in response to reduced ESG emphasis—particularly if fiduciary guidelines are revised. Given the long-term impact of environmental factors, this could have implications for how public systems assess risk.

Potential Treasury Secretary Picks

In addition to these policy changes, the individuals selected for key economic roles will significantly influence the administration's direction. Trump is considering hedge fund managers Scott Bessent and John Paulson for the role of Treasury Secretary. Bessent and Paulson have extensive experience in financial markets, and their appointments could indicate a shift towards more market-driven economic policies.

Bessent, formerly a top investor for George Soros, now leads Key Square Capital Management and has been Trump's economic advisor. He has proposed strategies to reduce the budget deficit and boost GDP growth through deregulation and increased oil production.

John Paulson, known for his successful bet against subprime mortgages during the 2008 financial crisis, has expressed intentions to significantly cut government spending if appointed as Treasury Secretary. Such cuts could involve reducing subsidies and other financial incentives related to green projects implemented under previous administrations.

The appointment of either Bessent or Paulson could signal a strong focus on reducing government intervention and promoting free-market principles, which would have significant implications for tax reforms, deregulation, and fiscal policies. Public pension systems should stay informed about these developments, as fiscal policy and economic strategy changes can directly impact investment environments and funding statuses.

Retirement Changes

In his second term, Trump has proposed several changes that could impact retirement planning and public pension systems:

• Affordable Housing: Affordable housing is a major issue for seniors, as they often live on fixed incomes and are less able to handle cost-of-living increases. Trump's plan for housing, as analyzed by the Bipartisan Policy Center, is focused on boosting the available housing supply. Proposals on this front include freeing up federal lands for building, easing regulations, offering tax incentives to first-time home buyers, and reducing immigration to free up housing.
• Medicare Reforms: Trump also has vowed to protect Medicare, but the details of how he plans to do that are unclear. During the campaign, he pledged to prioritize home care benefits by shifting resources back to at-home senior care, overturning disincentives that lead to care worker shortages, and supporting unpaid family caregivers through tax credits and reduced red tape.
• Social Security Adjustments: Trump has suggested eliminating the taxation of Social Security benefits, which would increase retirees' net income. However, this could reduce federal revenue, potentially affecting the program's long-term solvency. Additionally, he has proposed reducing payroll taxes, a primary funding source for Social Security, which may accelerate the program's financial challenges.
• Retirement Savings Incentives: Proposals to expand tax-advantaged retirement accounts, such as increasing contribution limits for 401(k) plans, are intended to encourage greater personal savings for retirement. This could benefit public employees by providing more opportunities to build personal retirement funds alongside their pension benefits.

What Comes Next?

While we can anticipate several broad trends, the specific details will depend on the legislative priorities of the new Congress and the regulatory actions taken by various federal agencies. Public pension leaders must remain vigilant and adaptable, keeping an eye on legislative developments that could directly or indirectly impact fund performance, fiduciary responsibilities, and member benefits.

As always, TEXPERS will continue to monitor the implications of these political changes and provide timely updates to help our members navigate the evolving landscape. Stay tuned for upcoming webinars and discussions that will dive deeper into these policy shifts and what they mean for public pensions.

Have thoughts on how these potential policy changes might impact your pension fund? Let's continue the conversation—reach out to us or comment below!

FOLLOW TEXPERS ON FACEBOOK, X (formally known as Twitter), THREADS, AND LINKEDIN FOR THE LATEST NEWS ABOUT TEXAS' PUBLIC PENSION INDUSTRY.